1.6 Multinational companies (MNCs) | IB DP Business Management

Home › Learning Hub › IB DP Business Management › 1.6 Multinational companies (MNCs)

Multinational companies make many of the goods we buy and employ millions of people outside their home countries. This short topic asks one big question: what is the impact of an MNC on the country that hosts it? The answer is almost always “it depends”, and the marks come from explaining on what.

🎯What you need to be able to do

Explain what a multinational company (MNC) is and why businesses become multinational.
Evaluate the impact of MNCs on host countries.

📚The business management

What is an MNC?

A multinational company (MNC) is a business that has its headquarters in one country (the home country) and operates (produces or provides services) in at least one other country (a host country). Selling abroad through exports is not enough; an MNC has operations, such as factories, offices or outlets, abroad.

A headquarters in the home country connected to operations in six host countries: a factory in Vietnam, a regional office in Singapore, an assembly plant in Indonesia, an R&D centre in India, a sales office in Australia and a call centre in the Philippines. — An illustrative MNC: each activity is placed where it is cheapest or most effective.

Why businesses become multinational: access to new markets and customers; lower production costs (labour, land, energy); access to raw materials; avoiding trade barriers by producing inside the market; economies of scale; spreading risk; tax advantages; closeness to customers to adapt products.

Examples in Indonesia include car makers (Toyota, Hyundai), consumer goods firms (Unilever, Nestlé), fast-food chains, and Chinese-owned nickel smelters. Indonesian firms also become MNCs: Indofood produces instant noodles in several countries.

The impact of MNCs on host countries

Positive impacts
Jobs and income, directly and through local suppliers.
Investment (foreign direct investment) in factories and infrastructure.
Transfer of technology, skills and management know-how to local workers and firms.
Tax revenue for the government.
Exports and foreign exchange.
More choice and competition for consumers.
Higher standards for suppliers (quality, safety).

Negative impacts
Profit repatriation: profits flow back to the home country.
Competition may drive local firms out of business.
Low wages or poor conditions in some cases; jobs may be low-skilled, with managers brought from abroad.
Environmental damage (pollution, deforestation).
Tax avoidance through transfer pricing and incentives demanded by MNCs.
Political influence over governments.
Footloose: an MNC can leave quickly, causing sudden job losses.
Cultural effects: erosion of local tastes and traditions.

What the impact depends on: the host government’s regulation and bargaining power (local-content rules, environmental and labour enforcement); the MNC’s own CSR; whether the MNC links to local suppliers and trains local staff; the sector (manufacturing that trains workers versus extraction with few jobs); and whether the host country’s own firms can learn and compete.

✏️Worked example

A foreign electronics MNC plans to build a smartphone assembly plant in an Indonesian industrial zone employing 3000 workers, in return for a ten-year tax holiday. Evaluate the likely impact on Indonesia.

Benefits: 3000 direct jobs plus indirect jobs at suppliers, transport firms and local shops; training in electronics assembly and quality control; exports that earn foreign exchange; possible transfer of technology to local component suppliers if the MNC sources locally.

Costs: the tax holiday means little tax revenue for ten years; profits are repatriated; jobs may be low-skilled assembly with key technology kept abroad; if costs rise, the MNC could relocate to another country when the tax holiday ends.

Judgment: the impact is likely positive if the government negotiates local-content and training requirements, so that local firms and workers gain lasting skills; without them, benefits may be short-lived. It depends on the terms of the deal as much as on the MNC.

Check it. Evaluate MNC impact for host country stakeholders: workers, local firms, government, consumers, environment. Different groups are affected differently.

Writing about the MNC’s benefits instead of the host country’s. The syllabus asks about the impact on the host country; lower costs for the MNC are not the point.

📝Practise

Work through these on paper, then reveal the answer.

1. [2 marks] Define the term multinational company.

A business with its headquarters in one country that has operations (production or service facilities) in one or more other countries.

2. [4 marks] Explain two reasons why a business might set up operations in another country.

(1) Lower costs: cheaper labour, land or energy reduce unit costs and increase competitiveness. (2) Access to markets / avoiding trade barriers: producing inside a large market avoids tariffs and transport costs and lets the firm adapt products to local tastes.

3. [4 marks] Explain how an MNC could help local suppliers in a host country.

If the MNC buys components and services locally, suppliers gain large, regular orders, which raise their sales and allow economies of scale. The MNC may also require and help them meet higher quality and safety standards, transferring skills that let them win other customers, including export contracts.

4. [4 marks] Explain two possible negative effects of an MNC on local businesses.

(1) Competition: the MNC’s economies of scale and brand power let it charge lower prices, driving small local firms out of business. (2) Competition for resources: the MNC may attract the best-skilled workers with higher pay and raise local wage and land costs for local firms.

5. [4 marks] Explain what is meant by a “footloose” MNC and why it is a risk for a host country.

A footloose MNC has no strong ties to a location and can relocate quickly when costs rise or incentives end elsewhere. For the host country, this means sudden job losses, lost tax revenue and damage to local suppliers, and the country may feel pressure to keep offering incentives.

6. [10 marks] Discuss the impact of a large multinational mining company on a remote region of a developing country.

Positive: jobs, royalties and taxes for government, infrastructure (roads, power), local procurement, community programmes under CSR or law.

Negative: environmental damage (deforestation, water pollution), displacement of communities, few skilled jobs for locals, profit repatriation, dependence on one industry, social tension.

Judgment: depends on regulation, enforcement, revenue sharing with the region and the company’s CSR; the long-term impact may be negative if the mine closes without leaving skills or diversified industries.

🔗Go deeper — other people’s work

These are external resources, not mine. If one stops working, tell me and everything above it on this page still stands.

UNCTAD World Investment Report — annual data and analysis of foreign direct investment by MNCs.
Indonesia’s Ministry of Investment (BKPM) — data on foreign investment by sector and province.
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises — expectations of responsible MNC behaviour.